@article {3393,
	title = {Prey depletion caused by overfishing and the decline of marine megafauna in eastern Ionian Sea coastal waters (central Mediterranean)},
	journal = {Biological conservationBiological Conservation},
	volume = {127},
	number = {4},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {373-382},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	keywords = {Mammalia},
	author = {Bearzi, G. and Politi, E. and Agazzi, S. and Azzellino, A.}
}
@article {3387,
	title = {Dolphins in a bottle: abundance, residency patterns and conservation of bottlenose dolphins <i>Tursiops truncatus </i>in the semi-closed eutrophic Amvrakikos Gulf, Greece},
	journal = {Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsAquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsAquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems},
	volume = {18},
	number = {2},
	year = {2008},
	note = {ISI Document Delivery No.: 286XRTimes Cited: 11Cited Reference Count: 59},
	month = {Mar-Apr},
	pages = {130-146},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {1. Boat surveys were conducted between 2002 and 2005 to study bottlenose dolphins living in the 400 km(2) Amvrakikos Gulf, western Greece. During 116 survey days, 4705 km of total effort resulted in the individual photo-identification of 106 animals, through long-term natural markings on their dorsal fins. 2. Mark-recapture analyses based on the M-th model provided estimates of 82 marked individuals in 2003 (95\% CI = 80-91), 92 in 2004 (95\% CI = 86-108) and 98 in 2005 (95\% CI = 94-110). To include the unmarked portion of the population, the proportion of unmarked individuals was computed based on the number of photographs of marked and unmarked dorsal fins. The mean proportion of unmarked animals in the population was 0.338 (95\% CI = 0.288-0.389). By adding this to the estimate for marked animals in 2005, considered as the most robust, a total population estimate of 148 individuals (95\% CI = 132-180) was obtained. 3. Dolphin encounter rates in 2003-2005 did not show significant variations, and averaged 7.2 groups per 100 km or 72.5 individuals per 100 km. Encounter rates within the Gulf were about one order of magnitude greater than those found for bottlenose dolphins in nearby eastern Ionian Sea coastal waters. 4. Mean dolphin density in the Gulf was 0.37 animals km(-2). This relatively high density, together with high levels of site fidelity shown by most individuals, was thought to be related primarily to prey availability, particularly of epipelagic schooling fish. 5. The importance of the semi-closed Amvrakikos Gulf for bottlenose dolphins and other threatened species encourages the adoption of measures aimed to conserve its valuable ecosystems and raise the naturalistic profile of the area, while promoting environment-conscious development. Meaningful action includes restoring natural hydrology (e.g. freshwater input from rivers), curtailing pollution from various sources, responsible fisheries and aquaculture management, and control of illegal fishing. Interactions between dolphins and fisheries also deserve careful quantitative investigation. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
	keywords = {abundance, Amvrakikos Gulf, cetaceans, coastal, conservation, EASTERN IONIAN SEA, ecology, estuaries, habitat, MEDITERRANEAN SEA, population, prey, size, Tursiops truncatus},
	isbn = {1052-7613},
	author = {Bearzi, G. and Agazzi, S. and Bonizzoni, S. and Costa, M. and Azzellino, A.}
}
