@conference {17390,
	title = {COMBINED NETWORK OF BIODIVERSITY AND ACOUSTIC VALUE IN GREECE},
	booktitle = {12TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON THE ZOOGEOGRAPHY AND ECOLOGY OF GREECE AND ADJACENT REGIONS},
	year = {2012},
	month = {September 2012},
	publisher = {HELLENIC ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY},
	organization = {HELLENIC ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY},
	address = {Athens},
	keywords = {acoustic, biodiversity, Natura 2000, noise, sound, ακουστική, βιοποικιλότητα, ήχος, θόρυβος},
	author = {Votsi, N.-E. P. and Mazaris, A. D. and Kallimanis, A. S. and Pantis, J. D.}
}
@article {15349,
	title = {Does higher taxon diversity reflect richness of conservation interest species? The case for birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles in Greek protected areas},
	journal = {Ecological IndicatorsEcological Indicators},
	volume = {8},
	number = {5},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {664},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	author = {Mazaris, A. D. and Kallimanis, A. S. and Sgardelis, S. P. and Pantis, J. D.}
}
@article {15352,
	title = {Modeling the effect of sea surface temperature on sea turtle nesting activities by investigating seasonal trends},
	journal = {Natural Resource ModelingNatural Resource Modeling},
	volume = {17},
	number = {4},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {445-465},
	keywords = {Reptilia},
	author = {Mazaris, A. D. and Kornaraki, E. and Matsinos, Y. G. and Margaritoulis, D.}
}
@article {15359,
	title = {Biogeographical patterns of freshwater micro- and macroorganisms: A comparison between phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish in the eastern Mediterranean},
	journal = {Journal of BiogeographyJournal of Biogeography},
	volume = {37},
	number = {7},
	year = {2010},
	note = {Cited By (since 1996): 2Export Date: 8 November 2011Source: Scopus},
	pages = {1341-1351},
	author = {Mazaris, A. D. and Moustaka-Gouni, M. and Michaloudi, E. and Bobori, D. C.}
}
@article {7215,
	title = {A retrospective study of mortality and morbidity factors for Common Buzzards <i>Buteo buteo </i>and Long-legged Buzzards <i>Buteo rufinus </i>in Greece: 1996-2005},
	journal = {Bird Conservation InternationalBird Conservation InternationalBird Conservation International},
	volume = {19},
	number = {1},
	year = {2009},
	note = {ISI Document Delivery No.: 426EYTimes Cited: 0Cited Reference Count: 32},
	month = {Mar},
	pages = {15-21},
	type = {Article},
	keywords = {birds, COLLISIONS, OWL BUBO-BUBO, population, POWER-LINES, raptors, spain, wildlife},
	isbn = {0959-2709},
	author = {Kalpakis, S. and Mazaris, A. D. and Mamakis, Y. and Poulopoulos, Y.}
}
@article {7202,
	title = {How does habitat diversity affect the species-area relationship?},
	journal = {Global Ecology and BiogeographyGlobal Ecology and BiogeographyGlobal Ecology and Biogeography},
	volume = {17},
	number = {4},
	year = {2008},
	note = {ISI Document Delivery No.: 311QMTimes Cited: 24Cited Reference Count: 35},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {532-538},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {Aim To examine the way in which {\textquoteright}area{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteright}habitat diversity{\textquoteright} interact in shaping species richness and to find a simple and valid way to express this interaction. Location The Natura 2000 network of terrestrial protected areas in Greece, covering approximately 16\% of the national territory. Methods We used the Natura 2000 framework, which provides a classification scheme for natural habitat types, to quantify habitat heterogeneity. We analysed data for the plant species composition in 16,143 quadrats in which 5044 species and subspecies of higher plants were recorded. We built a simple mathematical model that incorporates the effect of habitat diversity on the species-area relationship (SAR). Results Our analysis showed that habitat diversity was correlated with area. However, keeping habitat diversity constant, species richness was related to area; while keeping area constant, species richness was related to habitat diversity. Comparing the SAR of the 237 sites we found that the slope of the species-area curve was related to habitat diversity. Conclusions Discussion of the causes of the SAR has often focused on the primacy of area per se versus habitat heterogeneity, even though the two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and should be considered jointly. We find that increasing habitat diversity affects the SAR in different ways, but the dominant effect is to increase the slope of the SAR. While a full model fit typically includes a variety of terms involving both area and habitat richness, we find that the effect of habitat diversity can be reduced to a linear perturbation of the slope of the species accumulation curve.},
	keywords = {archipelago, birds, conservation, dependency, Greece, HABITAT DIVERSITY, habitat heterogeneity, islands, Land snails, model, Natura 2000, PER-SE, plants, richness, scale, Species richness, species-area relationship, WESTERN-AUSTRALIAN WHEATBELT},
	isbn = {1466-822X},
	author = {Kallimanis, A. S. and Mazaris, A. D. and Tzanopoulos, J. and Halley, J. M. and Pantis, J. D. and Sgardelis, S. P.}
}
@article {5507,
	title = {Freshwater fish community structured more by dispersal limitation than by environmental heterogeneity},
	journal = {Ecology of Freshwater FishEcology of Freshwater FishEcology of Freshwater Fish},
	volume = {18},
	number = {3},
	year = {2009},
	note = {ISI Document Delivery No.: 482XVTimes Cited: 2Cited Reference Count: 65},
	month = {Sep},
	pages = {369-379},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {We examined the relative contribution of environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on freshwater fish community composition in 18 Greek protected lakes and reservoirs. Environmental heterogeneity was measured by spatial pattern metrics (calculated by digital map processing, e.g., patch richness density, area-weighted mean patch area), altitude, maximum lake depth and trophic status. Dispersal limitation was measured by straight-line distances among lake centres. Ecosystems were clustered according to species composition. We examined the correlation of similarity in species composition among ecosystems with that of environmental heterogeneity and with straight-line distances, for the entire dataset, as well as for the occurring clusters. Fish species richness increased with ecosystem area and decreased with altitude. The clusters identified (aquatic ecosystems of Northern vs. ecosystems of Western Greece), implied an underlying biogeographical pattern as defined, with Pindus range acting as a natural barrier. Between ecosystems similarity, based on fish species composition, showed a weak to insignificant correlation with environmental heterogeneity, but was significantly correlated to dispersal limitation for the entire dataset as well as within each occurring cluster. Thus, natural barriers, species biogeography and dispersal limitation played a more significant role in shaping freshwater fish communities than environmental heterogeneity.},
	keywords = {biodiversity, dispersal barriers, ecological niche, FLORISTIC VARIATION, Greece, HABITAT DIVERSITY, INTRODUCED FISH, lake, landscape, landscape matrix, Natura 2000, NEUTRAL THEORY, SPATIAL-PATTERNS, Species richness},
	isbn = {0906-6691},
	author = {Drakou, E. G. and Bobori, D. C. and Kallimanis, A. S. and Mazaris, A. D. and Sgardelis, S. P. and Pantis, J. D.}
}
