@article {7437,
	title = {Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? Designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation},
	journal = {Biological ConservationBiological Conservation},
	volume = {120},
	number = {4},
	year = {2004},
	note = {Cited By (since 1996): 6Export Date: 5 September 2006Source: ScopusReferences: Arau?jo, M.B., Biodiversity hotspots and zones of ecological transition (2002) Conservation Biology, 16, pp. 1662-1663; Awimbo, J.A., Norton, D.A., Overmars, F.B., An evaluation of representativeness for nature conservation, Hokitika ecological district, New Zealand (1996) Biological Conservation, 75, pp. 177-186; Belbin, L., A multivariate approach to the selection of biological reserves (1995) Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, pp. 956-963; Bezzel, E., Die brutvo?gel bayerns und ihre biotope: Versuch de bewertung ihrer situation als grundlage fu?r planungs- und schutzma. nahmen (1980) Anzeiger der Ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern, 19, pp. 133-169; Cabeza, M., Moilanen, A., Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity (2001) Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, pp. 242-248; Caro, T.M., O{\textquoteright}Doherty, G., On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology (1999) Conservation Biology, 13, pp. 805-814; Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P.H., Pressey, R.L., Camm, J.D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, R.A., (...), Sahr, K., A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon (1997) Biological Conservation, 80, pp. 83-97; Devillers, P., Devillers-Terschuren, J., (1996) A Classification of Palearctic Habitats, , Strasbourg: Council of Europe; Devillers, P., Devillers-Terschuren, J., Ledant, J.-P., (1991) CORINE Biotopes Manual - Habitats of the European Community Data Specifications - Part2, , Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community; Faith, D.P., Walker, P.A., Environmental diversity: On the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas (1996) Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, pp. 399-415; Franklin, J.F., Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystems or landscapes? (1993) Ecological Applications, 3, pp. 202-205; Gaston, K.J., Williams, P.H., Spatial patterns in taxonomic diversity (1996) Biodiversity. a Biology of Numbers and Difference, pp. 202-229. , Kevin J. Gaston. Oxford: Blackwell Science; Hoctor, T.S., Carr, M.H., Zwick, P.D., Identifying a linked reserve system using a regional landscape approach: The florida ecological network (2000) Conservation Biology, 14, pp. 984-1000; Howard, P.C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T.R.B., Kigenyi, F.W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C.J., Lwanga, J.S., (...), Balmford, A., Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda (1998) Nature, 394, pp. 472-475; Kati, V., (2001) Methodological Approach on Assessing and Optimizing the Conservation of Biodiversity: A Case Study in Dadia Reserve (Greece), , Ph.D. Universite? catholique de Louvain; Kati, V., Dufre?ne, M., Legakis, A., Grill, A., Lebrun, Ph., Conservation management for Orthoptera in the Dadia Reserve, Greece (2004) Biological Conservation, 115, pp. 33-44; Kati, V., Devillers, P., Dufre?ne, M., Legakis, A., Vokou, D., Lebrun, Ph., Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at local scale (2004) Conservation Biology, 18, pp. 1-9; Keel, S., Gentry, A.H., Spinzi, C., (1991) Using Vegetation Analysis to Facilitate the Selection of Conservation Sites in Eastern Paraguay, pp. 62-73; Kirkpatrick, J.B., An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: An example from Tasmania (1983) Biological Conservation, 25, pp. 127-134; Kunin, W.E., Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: Implications for reserve design (1997) Biological Conservation, 82, pp. 369-377; Legendre, P., Anderson, M.J., (1998), http://alize.ere.unmontreal.ca/~casgrain/en/labo/distpcoa.html, Program Dist.P.Co.A. Departement de sciences biologiques, Universite? de Montreal. Web page; Legendre, P., Legendre, L., (1998) Numerical Ecology, Second English Edition, Developments in Environmental Modelling, 20. , Elsevier, Amsterdam; Legendre, P., Vaudor, A., (1991) The R Package - Multidimensional Analysis, Spatial Analysis Departement de Sciences Biologiques, , Montreal: Universite de Montreal; Lombard, A., The problem with multi-species conservation: Do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? (1995) South African Journal of Zoology, 30, pp. 145-163; Maddock, A., Du Plessis, M., Can species data only be appropriately used to conserve biodiversity? (1999) Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, pp. 603-615; Margules, C.R., Pressey, R.L., Systematic conservation planning (2000) Nature, 405, pp. 243-253; Margules, C.R., Usher, M.B., Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review (1981) Biological Conservation, 21, pp. 79-109; Meffe, G., Carrol, R., What is conservation biology? (1994) Principles of Conservation Biology, pp. 3-23. , G. Meffe, \& R. Carrol. USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc; Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, A.B., Kent, J., Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities (2000) Nature, 403, pp. 853-858; Nillson, C., Gotmark, F., Protected areas in Sweden: Is natural variety adequately represented? (1993) Conservation Biology, 6, pp. 232-241; Noss, R.F., Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach (1990) Conservation Biology, 4, pp. 355-364; Noss, R.F., Carroll, C., Vance-Borland, K., Wuerthner, G., A multicriteria assessment of the irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the greater yellowstone ecosystem (2002) Conservation Biology, 16, pp. 895-908; Noss, R.F., Strittholt, J.R., Vance-Borland, K., Carroll, C., Frost, P., A conservation plan for the klamath-siskiyou ecoregion (1999) Natural Areas Journal, 19, pp. 392-411; Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Powell, G.V.N., Wikramanayake, E.D., Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis (2002) Conservation Biology, 16, pp. 1-3; Parks, S.A., Harcourt, A.H., Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in US protected areas (2002) Conservation Biology, 16, pp. 800-808; Pienkowski, M.W., Bignal, E.M., Galbraith, C.A., McCracken, D.I., Stillman, R.A., Curis, D.J., A simplified classification of land-type zones to assist the integration of biodiversity objectives in land-use policies (1996) Biological Conservation, 75, pp. 11-25; Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C., Gibbon, D.W., Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotsposts and conservation strategies (1993) Nature, 365, pp. 335-337; Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I., Williams, P.H., Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic rerserve selection (1993) Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, pp. 124-128; Pressey, R.L., Nicholls, A.O., Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches (1989) Biological Conservation, 50, pp. 199-218; Pressey, R.L., Possingham, H.P., Day, J.R., Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying minimum requirements for conservation reserves (1997) Biological Conservation, 80, pp. 207-219; Purvis, A., Hector, A., Getting the measure of biodiversity (2000) Nature, 405, pp. 212-219; Reid, W.V., Biodiversity hotspots (1998) Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, pp. 275-280; Ricketts, T.H., Dinerstein, E., Olson, D.M., Loucks, C., Who{\textquoteright}s where in North America? (1999) Bioscience, 49, pp. 369-381; Rodriguez, L.O., Young, K.R., Biological diversity of peru: Determining priority areas for conservation (2000) AMBIO, 29, pp. 329-337; Saetersdal, M., Birks, H.J.B., Assessing the representativeness of nature reseves using multivariate analysis: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous forests, western Norway (1993) Biological Conservation, 65, pp. 121-132; (1985) S.A.S. User{\textquoteright}s Guide: Statistics Ver.5, , SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA; Shafer, C.L., Inter-reserve distance (2001) Biological Conservation, 100, pp. 215-227; Soberon, J., Rodriguez, P., Vazquez-Dominguez, Implications of the hierarchical structure of biodiversity for the development of ecological indicators of sustainable use (2000) Ambio, 29, pp. 136-142; Stoms, D.M., Borchert, M.I., Moritz, M.A., Davis, F.W., Church, R.L., Systematic process for selecting representative research natural areas (1998) Natural Areas Journal, 18, pp. 338-349; Strittholt, J.R., Boerner, R., Applying biodiversity gap analysis in a regional nature reserve design for the Edge of Appalachia, Ohio (USA) (1995) Conservation Biology, 9, pp. 1492-1505; Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.I., Williams, P.H., What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice (1991) Biological Conservation, 55, pp. 235-254; Wessels, K.J., Freitag, S., Van Jaarsveld, A.S., The use of land facets as biodiversity surrogates during reserve selection at local scale (1999) Biological Conservation, 89, pp. 21-38; Williams, P.H., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C., Pressey, R.L., A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of british birds (1996) Conservation Biology, 10, pp. 155-174; Wilson, E.O., (1992) The Diversity of Life, , New York: Norton.},
	month = {2004///},
	pages = {471-480},
	abstract = {Reserve networks are a major tool of ecological management aiming at biodiversity conservation. Maximizing the number of species conserved with the minimum land sacrifice is a primary requirement in reserve design. In this study, we examine the efficiency of five different scenarios to conserve: (i) the biodiversity of one target group and (ii) the overall biodiversity of an area. The study was conducted in Dadia Reserve, in northern Greece. Six groups of species were selected to represent its biodiversity: woody plants, orchids, Orthoptera, aquatic and terrestrial herpetofauna, and small terrestrial birds. The scenarios examined represent different conservation approaches to select network sites. For each approach, the starting point was one of the above six groups of species, considered as the target group. In scenario A, which reflects the hotspot approach, the sites richest in species are selected. Scenario B selects the sites most complementary in terms of species richness. The next two scenarios use the principle of environmental representativeness, expressed in terms of habitat (scenario C) or vegetation (scenario D). Under scenario E, sites forming the network are selected at random. The rank of scenarios in terms of preserving the species of the target group was always B>A>C>D>E, irrespective of the group considered as target group. Their rank, when preservation of the total biodiversity was the issue, was B, A>C, D>E. {\textcopyright} 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {biodiversity, Complementarity, conservation, Ecological networking, General, Reserve design},
	author = {Kati, V. and Devillers, P. and Dufrene, M. and Legakis, A. and Vokou, D. and Lebrun, P.}
}
@article {7439,
	title = {Conservation management for Orthoptera in the Dadia reserve, Greece},
	journal = {Biological ConservationBiological Conservation},
	volume = {115},
	number = {1},
	year = {2004},
	note = {Cited By (since 1996): 9Export Date: 5 September 2006Source: ScopusReferences: Adamakopoulos, T., Gatzogiannis, S., Poirazidis, K., Study on the assessment, the enhancement of the legal infrastructure and the management of the protected area in the forest of Dadia (1995) Special Environmental Study, , WWF - Greece, Athens; Armstrong, A.J., Van Hensberen, H.J., Identification of priority regions for animal conservation in afforestable montange grasslands of the northern Eastern Cape Province, South Africa (1999) Biological Conservation, 87, pp. 93-103; Bezzel, E., Die Brutvo?gel Bayerns und Ihre Biotope: Versuch de Bewertung ihrer Situation als Grundlage fu?r Planungs- Und Schutzma?nahmen (1980) Anzeiger der Ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern, 19, pp. 133-169; Blondel, J., Aronson, J., (1999) Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region, , Oxford University Press, New York, USA; Colwell, R.K., (1997) Estimate S: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Sample. Version 5. User{\textquoteright}s Guide and Application, , http://vice-roy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates; Devillers, P., Devillers-Terschuren, J., (1996) A Classification of Palearctic Habitats, , Council of Europe, Strasbourg; Dufre?ne, M., Legendre, P., Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach (1997) Ecological Monographs, 67, pp. 345-366; Dufre?ne, M., (1999) IndVal or How to Identify Indicator Species of a Sample Typology, , http://mrw.wallonie.be/dgrne/sibw/outils/indval/home.html; Fielding, D.G., Brusven, M.A., Ecological Correlates between Rangeland Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and Plant Communities of Southern Idaho (1995) Environmental Entomology, 24, pp. 1432-1441; Gandar, M.V., The dynamics and trophic ecology of grasshoppers (Acridoidea) in South African savanna (1982) Oecologia, 54, pp. 71-81. , Berlin; Green, S.V., The taxonomic impediment in orthopteran research and conservation (1998) Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, pp. 151-159; Grill, A., Kati, V., Butterflies of Dadia forest reserve (2000) Physis, 90, pp. 4-6; Guido, M., Gianelle, D., Distribution patterns of four Orthoptera species in relation to microhabitat heterogeneity in an ecotonal area (2001) Acta Oecologica, 22, pp. 175-185; Hallman, B., (1979) Guidelines for the Conservation of Birds of Prey in Evros, , IUCN/WWF (Unpublished study); Heller, K.G., Korsunovskaya, O., Ragge, D.R., Vedenina, V., Willemse, F., Zhantiev, R.D., Frantsevich, L., Check-list of European Orthoptera (1998) Articulata, 1 (61); Hoekstra, J.M., Conserving Orthoptera in the wild: Lessons from Trimerotropis infantilis (Oedipodinae) (1998) Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, pp. 179-185; Howard, P.C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T.R.B., Kigenyi, F.W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C.J., Lwanga, J.S., (...), Balmford, A., Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda (1998) Nature, 394, pp. 472-475; Huston, M.A., (1994) Biological Diversity. The Coexistence of Species in Changing Landscapes, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Kati, V., (2001) Methodological Approach on Assessing and Optimizing the Conservation of Biodiversity; a Case Study in Dadia Reserve (Greece), , PhD thesis. Universite? Catholique de Louvain; Kati, V., Lebrun, Ph., Devillers, P., Papaioannou, H., Les Orchide?es de la reserve de Dadia (Grece), leurs habitats et leur conservation (2000) Les Naturalistes Belges, 81, pp. 269-282; Kati, V., Willemse, F., Grasshoppers and crickets of the Dadia Forest Reserve (Thraki, Greece) with a new record to the Greek fauna: Paranocarodes chopardi Pechev 1965 (Orthoptera, Pamphagidae) (2001) Articulata, 1, pp. 11-19; Kerr, J., Species richness, endemism and the choice of areas for conservation (1997) Conservation Biology, 11, pp. 1094-1100; Legendre, P., Anderson, M.J., (1998) Program Dist.P.Co.A, , http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/biol/casgrain/en/labo/dispcoa.html, Departement de sciences biologiques, Universite? de Montre?al; Legendre, P., Legendre, L., (1998) Numerical Ecology. Second English Edition. Developments in Environmental Modelling, 20. , Elsiever Science B.V, Amsterdam; Legendre, P., Vaudor, A., (1991) Le Progiciel R. Analyse Multi-dimensionnelle, Analyse Spatiale, , Universite? de Montre?al, Montre?al, Canada; Linnell, J.D.C., Swenson, J.E., Andersen, R., Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: Large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones? (2000) Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, pp. 857-868; Lockwood, J.A., Grasshopper population dynamics: A prairie perspective (1996) The Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and Their Kin, pp. 103-127. , Gangwere, S.K., Muralirangan, M.C., Muralirangan, M. (Eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, UK; Lockwood, J.A., Management of orthopteran pests: A conservation perspective (1998) Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, pp. 253-261; Lombard, A., The problem with multi-species conservation: Do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? (1995) South African Journal of Zoology, 30, pp. 145-163; Martin, J., Lopez, P., The effect of Mediterranena dehesa management on lizard distribution and conservation (2002) Biological Conservation, 108, pp. 213-219; Munguira, M.L., Conservation of butterfly habitats and diversity in Mediterranean countries (1995) Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies, pp. 277-287. , Pullin, A.S. (Ed.), Chapman \& Hall, London; Parr, S.J., Naveso, M.A., Yarar, M., Habitat and potential prey surrounding lesser kestrel Falco naumanni colonies in central Turkey (1997) Biological Conservation, 79, pp. 309-312; Pechev, G.P., Une nouvelle e?spe?ce du Paranocarodes I. Bolivar 1916 (Orthoptera, Acrididae) de Bulgarie (1965) Bulletin of Institute of Zoological Museum of Academic Bulgarian Sciences, 19, pp. 73-83. , In Bulgarian, French summary; Poirazidis, K., Skartsi, Th., Katsadorakis, G., (2002) Monitoring Plan for the Protected Area of Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest, , WWF -Greece (unpublished study), Athens; Quinn, M.A., Johnson, P.S., Butterfield, C.H., Walgenbach, D.D., Effect of grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) density and plant composition on growth and destruction of grasses (1993) Environmental Entomology, 22, pp. 993-1002; Quinn, M.A., Kepner, R.L., Walgenbach, D.D., Nelson, F.R., Bohls, R.A., Pooler, P.D., Reuter, K.C., Swain, J.L., Habitat characteristics and grasshoppers community dynamics on mixed-grass rangeland (1991) Canadian Entomology, 123, pp. 89-105; Rentz, D.C.F., Orthopteroid insects in threatened habitats in Australia (1993) Perspectives of Insect Conservation, pp. 125-138. , Gaston, K.J., New, T.R., Samways, M.J. (Eds.), Intercept Ltd, Andover, UL; Ryszkowski, L., Karg, J., Margarit, G., Paoletti, M.G., Glotin, R., Above-ground insect biomass in agricultural landscape of Europe (1993) Landscape Ecology and Agroecosystems, pp. 71-82. , Bunce, R.G.H., Ryszkowski, L., Paoletti, M.G. (Eds.), Lewis, Boca Raton; Saetersdal, M., Line, J.M., Birks, H.J.B., How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: Vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway (1993) Biological Conservation, 66, pp. 131-138; Samways, M.J., Conservation biology of orthoptera (1997) Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and their Kin, pp. 481-496. , Gangwere, S.K., Muralirangan, M.C., Muralirangan, M. (Eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK and New York; Samways, M.J., Lockwood, J.A., Orthoptera conservation: Pests and paradoxes (1998) Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, pp. 143-149; Samways, M.J., Sergeev, M.G., Orthoptera and landscape change (1997) Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and their Kin, pp. 147-162. , Gangwere, S.K., Muralirangan, M.C., Muralirangan, M. (Eds.), CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK and New York; Sanchez-Zapata, A.J., Calvo, F.J., Raptor distribution in relation to landscape composition in semi-arid Mediterranean habitats (1999) Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, pp. 254-262; SAS User{\textquoteright}s Guide: Statistics, 1985. Ver. 5, , SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina, USA; Schulze, E.D., Mooney, H.A., (1993) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, , Springer, Berlin; Sergeev, M.G., Conservation of orthopteran biological diversity relative to landscape change in temperate Eurasia (1998) Journal of Insect Conservation, 2, pp. 247-252; Simberloff, D., Flagships, Umbrellas and Keystones: A single species management passe in the landscape era? (1998) Biological Conservation, 83, pp. 247-257; Willemse, F., (1985) A Key to the Orthoptera Species of Greece, , Hellenic Zoological Society, Athens; Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C., Pressey, R., A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds (1996) Conservation Biology, 10, pp. 155-174.},
	month = {2004///},
	pages = {33-44},
	abstract = {The diversity patterns, the ecological structure and the typical species of the orthopteran assemblage in the Dadia reserve are investigated. The reserve was designed to protect the black vulture (Aegypius monachus) and other raptors. A total of 39 orthopteran species were found, including Paranocarodes chopardi, a pamphagid species with very restricted distribution. All species can be represented in a network of six complementary habitats, including open oak woodlands, agricultural fields separated with hedges, humid grasslands, as well as serpentine grasslands. The buffer zone of the reserve is far more important for Orthoptera conservation than the core areas, which host most of the black vulture nests. Management focusing on raptors is in general compatible with conservation of Orthoptera. We suggest the maintenance of forest openings in the buffer zone, the maintenance of forest heterogeneity, the enhancement of periodical livestock grazing, and the use of nine indicator species and Paranocarodes chopardi in the reserve monitoring program. {\textcopyright} 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {biodiversity, conservation, management, Orthoptera, raptors, reserve},
	author = {Kati, V. and Dufrene, M. and Legakis, A. and Grill, A. and Lebrun, P.}
}
@article {7442,
	title = {Diversity, ecological structure and conservation of herpetofauna in a Mediterranean area (Dadia National Park, Greece)},
	journal = {Amphibia-ReptiliaAmphibia-ReptiliaAmphibia-Reptilia},
	volume = {28},
	number = {4},
	year = {2007},
	note = {ISI Document Delivery No.: 230HYTimes Cited: 14Cited Reference Count: 56},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {517-529},
	type = {Article},
	abstract = {The current study attempts to explore the diversity patterns and the ecological structure of herpetofauna in order to provide a guideline for its conservation management, taking as case study the Dadia national park, in Greece. We surveyed 36 sites by conducting time constraint visits and random transects to sample semi-aquatic (amphibians and freshwater terrapins) and terrestrial (lizards and terrestrial tortoises) herpetofauna respectively. We recorded 20 herpetofauna taxa, including five protected species. The park authorities should maintain brooks as a high priority habitat for semi-aquatic herpetofauna, periodically flooded land and lowland streams as important habitats, and to a lesser degree anthropogenic wet habitats. Semi-aquatic species have narrow habitat requirements related to substrate type and humidity. Terrestrial herpetofauna species are influenced by the degree of shade and the type of substrate; they favour a diversity of semi-open habitats (open oakwoods, heaths), located in the buffer zone rather than in the core of the park that contains densely forested habitats. Management focusing on raptors, the initial conservation priority of the national park, is compatible with the conservation of the terrestrial herpetofauna, as the proposed maintenance of an open forest structure is beneficial for terrestrial herpetofauna as well. Our research indicates that future management programs will have to address the needs of herpetofauna species independently and that they should also be integrated in the monitoring programme of the park, with emphasis on the conservation status and trend of the five protected species.},
	keywords = {AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION, amphibians, communities, conservation, ecological structure, fragmentation, GLOBAL DECLINE, habitat, human land, LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE, management, NATURE-RESERVE, patterns, reptiles, Species richness, TOAD BUFO-CALAMITA, use},
	isbn = {0173-5373},
	author = {Kati, V. and Foufopoulos, J. and Ioannidis, Y. and Papaioannou, H. and Poirazidis, K. and Lebrun, P.}
}
